(1) Group #6 - Chemical Activity

(2) Group #13 - Borderline Retarded

(3) Visual Appeal of site: 9  

(4) Content of site: 6  Too wordy and information too broad.  All the
information was not relevent to the main topic, DNA.  Tends to drift.
Also has many grammar/spelling mistakes in the summary, which were
distracting.

(5) WWW Suitability: 8  Relevence of sites.

(6) Relevence to Chem 210: 9

(7) Personal gain: 7  Information covered other topics than DNA.
Therefore the information was hard to follow and learn from. 

(1) Group #7 Chem Tigers
(2) Group #13 Borderline Retarted
(3) 10
(4) 10
(5) 9
(6) 9
(7) 10
Total: 48

(1)Group 8 Freak Accident
(2)Group 13 Borderline Retarded
(3)Visual Appeal of Site:10
(4)Content of Site:8 
	We found this site to be poorly organized, the text was jumpy and
it did not seem to correlate well.
(5)WWW suitability:10
(6)relevance to chem 210:9
	not much detail on molecules
(7)personal gain:9

(1) Group Number and Name of Evaluators- 9, Pie Stars

(2) Group Number and Name of Evaluees- 13, Borderline Retarded

(3) Visual Appeal: 7 points (little  appeal to attract browsers)

(4) Content of Site: 9 points (a lot of great info on the many aspects of
                     DNA)
(5) WWW Suitability: 9 points (many great links!)

(6) Relevance to Chem 210: 10 points (it is life, which is organic chem)

(7) Personal Gain: 10 Points

Total: 45 points

(1)#10 WESAYSO Inc.
(2)#13 Borderline Retard
(3) Visual: 8
Most sites didn't have great attention-grabbing gralphics.  Nothing
"screamed" out "Read Me".  Most pages were more text oriented instead of
graplhically interesting.


(4)Content:7
The subject of DNA was to broad and needed a focal point or two.  THis
would have provided a direction that viewer of the site could follow and
grasp the concept.

(5)Suitabiltiy:8
In general, information from the sites is just as accessable from
television or journals as it is from the internet.

(6)Relevance:8
Though DNA is relevant to Organic CHemistry, most of the sites weren't
well organized which did not provide a strong case for relevance.

(7)Personal Gain:8
The page covered a "hodge podge" of information about DNA that didn't go
into much detail to thoroughly explain each idea.