1) Group 6: Chemical Activity
2) Group 14: Apocalypse
3) Visual Appeal: 10  
4) Content of Site: 8  First links were very informative, but then the
later links were less informative and tended to drift from the topic.
5) Suitability to WWW: 9  
6) Relevance to chem 210: 7  Obviously, the topic IS relevant, but the
group did not make its case for this relevancy.
7) Personal Gain: 8  We gained a lot from the first couple of links, but
after that we assume that they were only for our entertainment.

(1) Group #7 Chem Tigers
(2) Group #14 Apocalypse
(3) 9
(4) 8
(5) 10
(6) 10
(7) 10
Total: 47

(1)Group 8 Freak Accident
(2)Group 14 Apocalypse
(3)Visual Appeal of Site:10
(4)Content:7
	The organization was confusing.  There were some good sites but
your comments didn't introduce us to what we were supposed to see.  You
also did not have all the required group meeting information.
(5)WWW suitability:10
(6)relevance to chem 210:10
(7)personal gain:8
	Some thought sites were funny, some thought they were offensive,
but we were all confused.

(1) Group Number and Name of Evaluators- 9, Pie Stars

(2) Group Number and Name of Evaluees- 14, Apocalypse

(3) Visual Appeal: 8 points

(4) Content of Site: 9 points (lots of info and descriptives)

(5) WWW Suitability: 10 points (Many great links with relevant info)

(6) Relevance to Chem 210: 10 points (olestra is made up of organic
                           compounds)

(7) Personal Gain: 10 points (the many additional links made it exciting
		   to learn)

Total: 47 points

Dr. Glaser,
        The following is a supplement to the more complete list that was
hopefully forwarded to you earlier:

(1) Group #10 WESAYSO INC
(2) GROUP #13 EVALUATION   (WAS MISLABELED.  THIS IS FOR GROUP 14)
(3) VISUAL: 9
        HAD SOME VISUALLY APPEALING SITES - rotating stars, country scenes
and dancing bunnies (molecules).The presentation was somewhat unclear. It
took several tries to figure out where we were going. Overall, probably
had more significance to the presenting group.
(4) Content: 7
        Could have used more specific "hard" information.
(5) Suitability: 8
        Generally it is a timely topic and this site did provide an
interesting overview. 
(6) Relevance: 8
        More connection to organic chemistry would have been nice.
Relevance was focused more on social and general aspects.
(7) Personal Gain: 8
        Not having a previous knowledge of Olestra (except by news
accounts) we felt that we came away generally more informed than when we
got to the site.

WESAYSO