Peer Assessment of Group 18
Peer Assessment of Group 18
Evaluation by Group 11
1) evaluators- group 11, "Hot Wings"
2) evaluees- group 18, "Six String"
3) visual appeal- 9
The sites and homepage were attractive
4) content- 8
Some of the links were confusing; one link did not exist. The other
links were pretty good
5) WWW suitablity- 9
The molecule was nice. The group used many of the better Web
capabilies (sound, etc.)
6) relevence to 210- 9
Some parts did not relate to organic chemistry as well as we would like
to see
7) personal gain- 8
There was not a lot of new information that we had not heard before.
TOTAL SCORE: 43
Evaluation by Group 12
1. Group 12 - Alkanetraz, 5 evaluators
2. Group 18 - Six String
3. 9
4. 8
5. 8
6. 9
7. 8
We felt the sites were well chosen for their content.
Evaluation by Group 13
Group #18--6 String
1) Visual Appeal--8
2) Content--10
3) WWW Suitability--8
4) Relevance to Chem210--9
5) Personal Gain--9
Total=44
Comments: Visual appeal of the sites not overly strong. In www
suitablility, mostly writing-something that could just as easily show up
on paper for the most part. A relevant topic to our age group.
Evaluation by Group 14
Evaluators- Group 14: Apocalypse
Evaluees- Group 18: 6-String
Visual Appeal- 7
The sites provided didn't have a large number of images, but there
were enough.
Content- 7
The links contained a lot of information but a lot of it was tough
to sort through to find the impotance.
Suitability- 8
The sites provided seemed fairly reliant on the net, but not
copletely.
Relevance- 8
Most of the links seemed fairly relevant to chem 210, but it was a
little hard to find.
Personal Gain- 8
The Group learned a decent amount about steroids from this project.
Evaluation by Group 15
1) Group 15: The Unknowns
2) Group 18: Six String
3) Visual Appeal: 8
4) Content of Site: 9
5) WWW Suitability: 7
6) Relavance to Chem 210: 8
7) Personal Gain: 9
Total: 41
We liked the link to the sex. One of your sites did not work. The ladies
liked the pictures of the semi nude guy.