| C A T E G O R Y | G21 | G22 | G23 | G24 | G25 | Average |
| Topic Selection
(0-20) |
20 | 15 | 20 | 18 | 20 | 18.6 |
| Newspaper and Article Selection
(0-10) |
7 | 10 | 8 | 8 | 10 | 8.6 |
| Quality of Editorial Comments
(0-10) |
9 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9.2 |
| Organic Chemistry Content
(0-10) |
8 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 9 |
| Selection and Quality of the Links
(0-20) |
19 | 15 | 19 | 16 | 15 | 16.8 |
| Format, Number and Types of Questions
(0-10) |
10 | 9 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 9.2 |
| Quality of the Questions
(0-10) |
9 | 10 | 10 | 7 | 10 | 9.2 |
| Overall Impression
(0-10) |
8 | 9 | 10 | 9 | 9 | 9 |
| TOTAL | 89.6 |
Evaluation by Group 21
(1) Topic Selection: 20 Points
(0-20)
The topic affects a lot of people. My mom has diabetes, so I can
really relate to this story.
(2) Newspaper and Article
Selection: 7 Points (0-10)
Article was terribly long, not to mention boring.
(3) Quality of the Editorial
Comments: 9 Points (0-10)
(4) Organic Chemistry Content:
8 Points (0-10)
Not much of a link to organic chemistry. Almost anything is a chemical
and has an IUPAC name.
(5) Selection and Quality
of the Links: 19 Points (0-20)
Good links, especially the Government agency links.
(6) Format, Number and Types
of Questions: 10 Points (0-10)
(7) Quality of the Questions:
9 Points (0-10)
Good questions, but didn't stimulate our minds.
(8) Overall Impression. 8
Points (0-10)
Editorial was good, but the article was boring.
Evaluation by Group 22
1. Topic Selection-- 15 points
Good Topic with lots of information. It did seem a bit
long though because I think that nine pages are a bit long.
2. Newpaper and
Article Selection-- 10 points
It was published in a very reputable newpaper.
3. Quality of
Editorial Comments-- 10 points
The questions were very good and seemed to actually make
the reader think.
4. Organic Chemistry
Content-- 10 points
The article and the questions both contained ideas that
were very relevant to organic chemistry.
5. Selection
and Quality of Links-- 15 points
We thought the links were too boring and didn't pertain
toomuch to the article.
6. Format, Number,
and Types of Questions- 9 points
The questions were good especially the last one because it
actually did make us think about what the article said.
7. Quality of
Questions-- 10 points
Good Questions
8. Overall Impression
9 points
Very good except for the links
Evaluation by Group 23
(1) Topic Selection: 20 Points
(0-20)
The title is very catchy.
(2) Newspaper and Article
Selection: 8 Points (0-10)
The article was a bit too long for us impatient readers.
(3) Quality of the Editorial
Comments: 10 Points (0-10)
The comments were good.They address the drug mentioned in the article and
provide information pertinent to the topic.
(4) Organic Chemistry Content:
10 Points (0-10)
Yes the article provided sufficient organic data about the above mentioned
topic.Important compounds have been illustrated with good examples in the
article.
(5) Selection and Quality
of the Links: 19 Points (0-20)
The links were very useful and provided information where we needed it.They
are blended well into the editorial.
(6) Format, Number and Types
of Questions: 10 Points (0-10)
All questions,including the PSP questions were all there and in good variety.
(7) Quality of the Questions:
10 Points (0-10)
The questions were very informative and address the key issues in the article.
(8) Overall Impression. 10
Points (0-10)
This group did a good job.The article was informative but lengthy,the editorial
strengthened it,and the questions were in good variety.
None
Evaluation by Group 24
(1) Topic Selection: 18 Points (0-20)
(2) Newspaper and Article
Selection: 8 Points (0-10)
(3) Quality of the Editorial
Comments: 9 Points (0-10)
(4) Organic Chemistry Content:
9 Points (0-10)
(5) Selection and Quality
of the Links: 16 Points (0-20)
(6) Format, Number and Types
of Questions: 7 Points (0-10)
(7) Quality of the Questions:
7 Points (0-10)
(8) Overall Impression. 9 Points (0-10)
Evaluation by Group 25
(1) Topic Selection: X Points
(0-20)
20 points awarded. Excellent
topic. Very interesting article
(2) Newspaper and Article
Selection: X Points (0-10)
10 points awarded (L.A.
Times=Good)
(3) Quality of the Editorial
Comments: X Points (0-10)
8 points awarded. Would have like
to seen more chemistry in the
Editorial
(4) Organic Chemistry Content: X
Points (0-10)
8 points awarded. The article
obviously contains a lot of organic
oriented issues, however, these
were not addressed directly in the
editorial.
(5) Selection and Quality of the
Links: X Points (0-20)
15 points awarded. There are a
couple good links that really
provide the reader with additional
chemical information. The
remaining links, however, are very
general and do not aide in
strengthening the article.
(6) Format, Number and Types of
Questions: X Points (0-10)
10 points awarded. Questions
covered all areas.
(7) Quality of the Questions: X
Points (0-10)
10 points awarded. Good
questions.
(8) Overall Impression. X Points
(0-10)
9 points awarded. Very Nice
page!
Overall Score:
90/100