| C A T E G O R Y | G21 | G22 | G23 | G24 | G25 | Average |
| Topic Selection
(0-20) |
18 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 20 | 19 |
| Newspaper and Article Selection
(0-10) |
9 | 10 | 10 | 9 | 10 | 9.6 |
| Quality of Editorial Comments
(0-10) |
10 | 8 | 10 | 6 | 9 | 8.6 |
| Organic Chemistry Content
(0-10) |
9 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9.2 |
| Selection and Quality of the Links
(0-20) |
20 | 17 | 20 | 18 | 20 | 19 |
| Format, Number and Types of Questions
(0-10) |
10 | 8 | 10 | 10 | 10 | 9.6 |
| Quality of the Questions
(0-10) |
10 | 10 | 9 | 8 | 10 | 9.4 |
| Overall Impression
(0-10) |
9 | 9 | 10 | 8 | 10 | 9.2 |
| TOTAL | 93.6 |
Evaluation by Group 21
(1) Topic Selection: 18 Points (0-20)
Very pertinent organic information, but a little dry.
(2) Newspaper and Article
Selection: 9 Points (0-10)
Great science, needs to be more interesing (too boring).
(3) Quality of the Editorial
Comments: 10 Points (0-10)
Very well written, very pertinent, and interesting.
(4) Organic Chemistry Content:
9 Points (0-10)
We think that a little more background on the organic chemistry would
help comprehension.
(5) Selection and Quality
of the Links: 20 Points (0-20)
Great links from excellent sources (i.e.NASA). WE like the tar picture.
(6) Format, Number and Types
of Questions: 10 Points (0-10)
Great questions, nice variety. Really got us thinking.
(7) Quality of the Questions:
10 Points (0-10)
Very clear and they were not far fetched. Nice wording on the second
question, even if you read the article you
still had to think.
(8) Overall Impression. 9
Points (0-10)
Great overall. The article was just a little boring.
Evaluation by Group 22
(1) Topic Selection: 18 Points (0-20)
This topic is very interesting. It gives new possibilities on the
origin of life.
(2) Newspaper and Article
Selection: 10 Points (0-10)
This article was taken from a very respected magazine.
(3) Quality of the Editorial
Comments: 8 Points (0-10)
The comments were well thought out but more personal thoughts on subject
would have been nice.
(4) Organic Chemistry Content:
10 Points (0-10)
This article deals directly with the origin of all organic material on
the planet.
(5) Selection and Quality
of the Links: 17 Points (0-20)
These links were well thought out in their selection. They helped
me to gain a greater understanding of the subject material.
(6) Format, Number and Types
of Questions: 8 Points (0-10)
This does contain five questions. More variety in the questions would
have been good.
(7) Quality of the Questions:
10 Points (0-10)
The questions address the central issues of the article.
(8) Overall Impression. 9
Points (0-10)
This is a well thought out web page. I would have liked to see more
detail in both the questions and the editorial comments.
Total Score: 90
Evaluation by Group 23
(1) Topic Selection: 19 Points
(0-20)
Good Topic!!!
(2) Newspaper and Article
Selection: 10 Points (0-10)
Author seemed very qualified. ABC is definetly a high quality source.
Article is not too long or too short and it gives you a good overview
of the subject.
(3) Quality of the Editorial
Comments: 10 Points (0-10)
the Editorial was not too technical and could be understood bt most.
Definetly well organized!
(4) Organic Chemistry Content:
9 Points (0-10)
There was a decent amount of organic chem. content.
there could have been a link to chemfinder in order to view molecules
in more detail.
(5) Selection and Quality
of the Links: 20 Points (0-20)
Links were great! Enough said!
(6) Format, Number and Types
of Questions: 10 Points (0-10)
great!
(7) Quality of the Questions:
9 Points (0-10)
Some answers were vague...link to Chemfinder would have been nice.(for
example Q. #2)
(8) Overall Impression. 10
Points (0-10)
This would be a good choice for Prentice Hall......especially with more
links to chemfinder to see molecules in question.
Your web page was fantastic. The links in the editorial were informative,
interesting and covered a wide array of subjects.
Evaluation by Group 24
(1) Topic Selection: 20 Points (0-20)
I think this is a topic that most people will find interesting, and it
relates to organic chemistry. Good!
(2) Newspaper and Article
Selection: 9 Points (0-10)
Definitely recent. The article could be a bit more science-minded,
but it is good.
(3) Quality of the Editorial
Comments: 6 Points (0-10)
Comments are fine but a bit thin. The comments should show that you
not only have a firm understanding of the article, but also about
the
topic in general. I think you do, although this could be
more
apparent. English is good, although the number of passive sentences
at the beginning are troublesome. Also, diction could be
better.
(4) Organic Chemistry Content:
8 Points (0-10)
You ask for the structures to be drawn, but then you don't explain the
relevance.
(5) Selection and Quality
of the Links: 18 Points (0-20)
Links are good.
(6) Format, Number and Types
of Questions: 10 Points (0-10)
Good.
(7) Quality of the Questions:
8 Points (0-10)
Where did the life on Mars come from? Whatever is one word.
(8) Overall Impression. 8
Points (0-10)
Overall, a job well done...just a little rough around the edges.
Evaluation by Group 25
(1) Topic Selection: X Points
(0-20)
20 points awarded. Really good
topic...very interesting.
(2) Newspaper and Article
Selection: X Points (0-10)
10 points awarded (credible
article...again very interesting)
(3) Quality of the Editorial
Comments: X Points (0-10)
9 points awarded. Good
reinforcement of the article in the
editorial comments.
(4) Organic Chemistry Content: X
Points (0-10)
10 points awarded. No need to
explain.
(5) Selection and Quality of the
Links: X Points (0-20)
20 points awarded. The links were
highly informative.
(6) Format, Number and Types of
Questions: X Points (0-10)
10 points awarded. All areas
covered.
(7) Quality of the Questions: X
Points (0-10)
10 points awarded. Very good
questions.
(8) Overall Impression. X Points
(0-10)
10 points awarded. A very nice job
on entire article. The editorial
comments are strong, the links are
stable as well as informative, and
the reader receives an in-depth
learning experience. Nice Job!
Overall Score:
99/100