Peer Assessment of Group 4 - Project 2
Peer Assessment of Group 4
| Category |
Group 1 |
Group 2 |
Group 3 |
Group 5 |
Average |
| Topic and Paper Selection
(0-15) |
13 |
12 |
12 |
15 |
13 |
| Synposis and Identification of
Specific Problem (0-15) |
10 |
11 |
12 |
9 |
10.5 |
| Spectroscopy Section (0-10) |
8 |
7 |
8 |
7 |
7.5 |
| Format, Number and Types of
Questions (0-10) |
9 |
8 |
8 |
7 |
8 |
| Quality of the Questions (0-20) |
18 |
17 |
16 |
17 |
17 |
| Presentation & Defense (0-20) |
16 |
17 |
16 |
17 |
16.5 |
| Overall Impression (0-10) |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
8 |
| TOTAL |
82 |
80 |
80 |
80 |
80.5 |
Evaluation by Group 1
(A)Evaluators
Group 1: Dissolved in Water Emma Teuten, Mike Lewis, & Paul Benny
(B)Evaluees
Group 4:Gang of Three
(C)Responses To Evaluation Categories
(1)Topic and Paper Selection(0-15)............................13/15
(2) Synopsis and Identification of Specific Problem(0-15).....10/15
Too brief. Defining the problem in more detal would have helped to
clarify things.
(3)Spectroscopy Section(0-10)..................................8/10
(4)Format(0-10) ...............................................9/10
(5)Quality of the Questions(0-20).............................18/20
Qu.s 1 and 2 would have made more sense if they were reversed. We liked
qu. 5- very clever.
(6)Presentation & Defense(0-20)...............................16/20
Qu.s were answered very well. At times, though, which epimers were being
discussed got a bit confusing.
(7)Overall Impression(0-10)....................................8/10
Total........................................................82/100
Evaluation by Group 2
(A) Evaluators
Group 2 JAW Asitha, Wen and Jianzheng
(B) Evaluee
Group 4 Gang of Three
(C)Responses To Evaluation Categories
(1) Topic and Paper Selection 12
(2) Synopsis and Identification of Specific Problem 11
Too simple
(3)Spectroscopy Section 7
The spectrum is not clear enough
(4)Format 8
(5)Quality of the Questions 17
(6)Presentation & Defense 17
(7)Overall Impression(0-10 8
Evaluation by Group 3
> (A) Group 3: Bible Study Class
>
> (B) Group 4: Gang of Three
>
> (C)
>
> (1). Topic and Paper Selection: 12 Points
>
> (2). Synposis and Identification of Specific Problem: 12 Points
>
> (3). Spectroscopy Section: 8 Points
>
> (4). Format, Number and Types of Questions: 8 Points
>
> (5). Quality of the Questions: 16 Points
>
> (6). Presentation and Defense: 16 Points
>
> (7). Overall Impression: 8 Points
>
> TOTAL POINTS: 80 Points
Evaluation by Group 5
A) Group 5 Alcohol Protecting Group
B) Group 4 Gang of Three
C)
1) Topic and Paper Selection: 15
fulfilled all requirements
2) Synposis and Identification of Specific Problem: 9
introduction a little brief
3) Spectroscopy Section: 7
spectra could be cleaner
the 2 model compounds in fig 1 are not necessary
4) Format, Number and Types of Questions: 7
question 1 should be RQD
question 2 should be EVL
question 3 maybe SCL
5) Quality of Questions: 17
questions were reasonable
6) Presentation & Defense: 17
nice presentation - handled questions fairly very well
7) Overall Impression: 8
problem relates well to topics covered in class